Skip to main content

The Great EEOC Roundup: September Edition

 

As always, there are some EEOC cases that jump out at me when I review developments on that front.  Below are a couple EEOC cases and settlements that caught my eye this month.


Lawsuit Filed Against Chipotle for Sexual Harassment & Retaliation

Earlier this month, a sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit was filed against Chipotle.  The lawsuit claims that a Tampa location service manager was sexually harassed by a coworker and was unlawfully terminated when a complaint was made.  After the coworker made several suggestive comments to the manager, the conduct escalated to two sexual assaults in one day.  While the prior harassment had already been reported to store management, the manager stated she planned to report the sexual assaults to corporate.  Within three days, the manager was terminated.  This alleged conduct, if true, is in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits discrimination based upon sex and retaliation against workers that complain of the discrimination.


EEOC Brings Suit Against Frito-Lay For Alleged Religious Discrimination

Recently, Frito-Lay (a subsidiary of Pepsi) was sued over a claim that it unlawfully discriminated against an employee because of his religion.  According to the lawsuit, the employee was promoted from a warehouse position to a route sales representative role.  This promotion required the employee to undergo training.  After approximately five weeks of training without having to train on Saturdays, Frito-Lay set a training session for him on a Saturday despite being informed that the employee was a Seventh-day Adventist (and therefore could not work on Saturday because of his religious beliefs.)  After the employee did not report for a training session on two Saturdays, he was terminated.  This alleged conduct is in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which prohibits discrimination against employees based on their religion and requires employees to reasonably accommodate an employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs so long as it would not create an undue burden on the employer.


Subway Franchisee Hit With Disability Discrimination Lawsuit

A week ago, a Subway franchisee in Indiana was hit with a disability discrimination lawsuit on the grounds that it unlawfully rejected an applicant that was qualified for the position for which he applied because he was hard of hearing and had a speech impediment.  The lawsuit claims the franchisee cited a “communication concern” due to the applicant’s “hearing” and “speaking.”  This alleged conduct, if true, would be in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act which prohibits discrimination against employees or applicants on the basis of a disability.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...
Post a Comment
Read more