Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Just when I think I get a chance to catch my breath and get a leg up on things in the office do I turn around and find out I have a busy next week ahead of me.  Although that has left me scrambling to get things prepped for a few work trips next week, I was able to find some time the past few days reading through some articles to highlight here.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


5 Things to Consider For Workplace Investigations

In many workplaces, there are inevitably going be claims of harassment that are alleged.  For employers (or those in Human Resources), the investigation itself is a pivotal step in determining whether harassment actually occurred and what the next steps need to be.  Anthony Zaller at the California Employment Law Report provided five key things that each investigation could encompass, although the list is not exhaustive.  Rather, I think these five tips provide readers with food for thought in regard to how they can strengthen their own workplace investigations going forward.


Are Employees Able to Work From Home? Great, But First, A Few Thoughts

Work from home is a perk of employment for many employees that have the option to use it.  Avoiding the grind of traffic, parking, and the daily commute can lead to more content employees and a better overall work product.  With that being said, not all work from home policies are clearly defined which can lead to confusion among employees and employers alike about how a work from home option is to be "governed."  Brenda Baumgart wrote an article earlier this month that provides employers with several things to keep in mind, for those that offer employees a work from home option.  One of the main tips here is for employers to remember to have these work from home employees safeguard confidential and proprietary information.  While this is somewhat easier to do in the actual workplace, there are a host of variables that make this a more sensitive matter for those employees that work from home.



David Pryzbylski wrote an article that addresses when an employer decides to terminate an employee for a social media posts.  While some employers are quick to pull the trigger on these terminations, using a National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") matter as an example, David advises employers to proceed with caution.  As the NLRB has previously determined, in certain instances, an employee's social media posts can qualify as concerted activity undertaken for their "mutual aid and protection" such that this is protected activity under the National Labor Relations Act.  While every case is different, and this analysis from David might not apply to every situation, it is worth a quick read for those employers (or employees) in a similar situation.


Troubling Pattern of Sexual Harassment of Congressional Custodians Revealed

Sexual harassment has become a hot button issue over the past few years, due in no small part to the #MeToo movement gaining traction.  While Congress has taken steps to curb sexual harassment in the workplace, Katherine Tully-McManus at Roll Call recently noted a troubling pattern of members of Congress allegedly sexually harassing night shift custodial staff at the Capitol.  While the 53 page report does not specifically mention which members of Congress have been accused of engaging in this conduct, it is noted that dozens of members of Congress routinely sleep in their offices...which has been speculated to put them in a position to sexually harass custodial staff.  While the report is rather dense, it is worth a review.  With any luck, this report will help spur change at the Capitol to bring amount a workplace that is not permeated with sexual harassment toward the custodial staff.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...