Skip to main content

Updated: New Mexico Legislature Compromises On Competing Minimum Wage Bills


Earlier last month, the New Mexico House and Senate compromised and agreed on a minimum wage hike for hourly workers in the state.

Readers will recall that there were two "competing" minimum wage bills working their way through the New Mexico Legislature this session:  House Bill 31 (which would raise the state's hourly minimum wage rate to $12/hour by 2021 and tied to the inflation rate and increased thereafter) and Senate Bill 437 (which would raise the state's hourly minimum wage rate to $10/hour by next April, but not have any inflation adjustments).  While House Bill 31 had the support of many advocacy groups and union representatives, Senate Bill 437 enjoyed the support of chambers of commerce and business groups in the state.  One of the key areas of contention, besides the different wage rates, was the fact that Senate Bill 437 did not have the inflation adjustment.

A few weeks ago, after much debate and disagreement over the competing bills, a compromised was reached in which the state's current hourly wage rate of $7.25/hour will increase to $9.00/hour in January 202, $10.50/hour in January 2021, $11.50/hour in January 2022, and $12.00/hour in January 2023.  There will be no increase for inflation.  Readers will note that this compromise mirrors the initial wording of Senate Bill 437, whereas House Bill 31 was "abandoned" for all intents and purposes.

On March 8, the Senate approved Senate Bill 437 with a 27 - 15 vote in favor.  On March 13, the House approved Senate Bill 437 with a 43 - 21 vote in favor (with 2 "excused" votes and 4 "absent" votes).  At this point, the legislation moves to Democratic Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's desk for signature (or veto).  While some reports indicated the Governor wanted the inflation adjustment to be a part of any minimum wage legislation, this end result is a pretty good compromise that I would be surprised if she did not sign.  With that being said, until the Governor puts pen to paper, this minimum wage hike hangs in limbo.


For a copy of the amended language of Senate Bill 437:  https://www.nmlegis.gov/Sessions/19%20Regular/Amendments_In_Context/SB0437.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per