Skip to main content

Take Three: Unionization Effort at Tennessee Volkswagen Plant


Stop me if you have heard this before:  A Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee attempts to unionize, despite mounting pressure not to do so.  Sound familiar?  Well it turns out there is another attempt to unionize that same Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga...the third petition seeking to unionize over the past five years.  As a bit of background, in 2014, the United Auto Workers ("UAW") lost an election by a margin of 712 to 626 votes.  In 2015, the UAW won an election among a smaller unit of maintenance workers by a margin of 108 to 44.  However, Volkswagen appealed that election and has continued to refuse to bargain with this micro-union, claiming the entire group of production and other workers should have been included in the vote.  That matter is currently before the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB").

Last week, workers at the plant again filed another union election petition with the NLRB seeking to have the UAW represent them.  According to the petition, approximately 30% of the 1,709 production, skilled trades and other workers at the plant indicate they want to be unionized.  The petition requests an election on April 29th and 30th.  I do not need to tell readers that this is a very, very short time frame before the requested election.  This does not give Volkswagen much time to mount opposition to the unionization effort, should it actually occur later this month.

The UAW has lauded this petition as proof that the plant's workers want to be unionized.  As well, some workers have been vocal of their intention to achieve unionization with this petition, pointing out that if Volkswagen said it would bargain if production and maintenance workers voted, this third petition would put the matter to rest.

Something tells me this will become even more of a hot button issue over the next few weeks.  The next thing to look out for will be whether the union election actually occurs later this month, something that I would expect the NLRB to decide upon soon.



For an update from the NLRB filings:  https://www.nlrb.gov/case/10-RC-239234

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more