Skip to main content

The Great EEOC Roundup: April Edition


As always, there are some EEOC cases that jump out at me when I review developments on that front.  Below are a couple EEOC cases and settlements that caught my eye this week.


JBS Carriers to Settle Disability Discrimination Suit for $250,000.00

At the start of the month, the EEOC announced that JBS Carriers, a nationwide t idling company, was settling a disability discrimination suit for $250,000.00.  The suit against the company alleged that during the pre-employment screening of applicants, those with disabilities (that were otherwise qualified) were unlawfully screened out.  (JBS used a third party to administer the screening.) The screening included a medical history questionnaire for applicants to complete, a physical examination, and a nine point physical ability test.  If an applicant was unable to complete any of this screening, the third party gave JBS a negative job recommendation for that applicant.  JBS apparently  would withdraw a job offer based upon this negative job recommendation.  However, as readers might have gathered h this point, this conduct is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) which prohibits employers from imposing standards or criteria for employees or applicants that have the effect of discriminating based on disability or that screen out individuals with a disability.


Golden Corral Restaurant Franchisee to Settle Disability Discrimination Suit for $31,000.00

A Golden Corral restaurant franchisee has agreed to settle a disability discrimination suit for $31,000.00 after the franchisee was sued for allegedly terminating an employee after it accused the employee of “being unwilling or unable to control her epilepsy.”  This alleged conduct is in violation of the ADA which prohibits an employer from discriminating against an employee because of their disability or perceived disability.  This settlement should serve as a gentle reminder to employers of what not to do when addressing an employee’s disability.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more