Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Over the coming months, we will start to see more and more coverage of candidates running for President in 2020.  For the sake of this blog, I will attempt to keep that topic focused on how the candidates stand on relevant labor & employment law matters.  In doing so, a recent article from Politico offers a timely analysis of workplace harassment matters and a related piece of legislation that has been introduced in Congress (and supported by several Democratic Senators running for President.)

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Tipping Hotel Housekeepers? Some Do, Others Do Not

Tammy La Gorce at The New York Times wrote an article back in 2017 that provided readers with an interesting question:  In an industry where many employees often do not make much money, should it be customary for hotel housekeepers to be tipped by guests?  Although this article is from a few years ago, it is still timely and worth a read.  As the article notes, many hotel housekeepers find they cannot make ends meet, based upon the rate of pay they receive from their employers.  That leaves many housekeepers leaving envelopes in hotel rooms for hotel guests to leave a tip for the cleaning services.  Some employers frown upon this practice while others go so far as to provide the envelopes themselves (with the hotel logo on the envelope) or give hotel guests the option to leave a tip on their credit card when checking out of their room.  On the other hand, some hotel guests feel affronted by this request and counter that it is the employer's responsibility to pay their employees a livable wage, rather than requiring them to solicit tips to make ends meet.  While there is no clear cut answer either way as to whether tipping hotel housekeepers should become the norm, with rising costs of living that do not mirror stagnant wage growth, I suspect this practice will continue.



Readers might recall that some Democratic candidates for President in 2020 have been dogged by claims of workplace harassment in their campaigns (or prior campaigns) and Congressional offices.  On Tuesday, several Democratic candidates for President, including Senators Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren voiced their support for the BE HEARD Act.  This proposed legislation would strengthen discrimination protections for LGBTQ employees, ban the use of mandatory arbitration and non-disclosure agreements for harassment claims, eliminate the tipped minimum wage, and make it easier for employees to report on the job harassment.  As Alice Miranda Ollstein at Politico reports, this legislation is noteworthy in so much that it would tackle workplace harassment across the board (rather than in more limited circumstances as prior legislation had addressed.)  It will be interesting to see how the BE HEARD Act advances through Congress, with many voters paying close attention to the matter heading into next year's election.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more