Skip to main content

The Great EEOC Roundup: February Edition


As always, there are some EEOC cases that jump out at me when I review developments on that front.  Below are a couple EEOC cases and settlements that stand out.



Earlier this month, the EEOC announced a settlement had been reached with Llanerch Country Club ("LCC") after the employer agreed to pay $30,000.00 to settle an age discrimination lawsuit.  The suit arose out of a claim that LCC began to treat its oldest groundskeeper in the grounds maintenance department differently than younger workers.  LCC was apparently laying the oldest groundskeeper off during the winter season.  As recently as December of 2016, the oldest groundskeeper was laid off for the winter but was later informed he would not be recalled or rehired in 2017 because LCC was "looking to take the staff in a younger direction".  Less than three weeks later, LCC hired nine other groundskeepers that were significantly younger.  This conduct violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act which protects workers age 40 and over from employment discrimination because of their age, including discrimination in the terms and conditions of employment and employment and in discharge and hiring decisions.


Systematic Sex Discrimination Suit Filed Against American Freight Furniture and Mattress

The EEOC has filed a systematic sex discrimination suit against American Freight Furniture and Mattress, charging that since 2013 the employer has engaged in a nationwide pattern or practice of discrimination against women and intentionally excluding qualified female applicants from sales and warehouse jobs because of their sex.  Of note, corporate managers instructed store managers to not hire women because women "complain and make trouble".  This alleged conduct, if proven true, would violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.


Multiple Franchisees of IHOP Settle Sexual Harassment & Retaliation Suit For $700,000.00

Several franchisees of IHOP in Nevada and New York faced a lawsuit by the EEOC which charged that these franchisee owners, supervisors, managers, and co-workers subjected female employees to ongoing egregious sexual harassment at restaurant locations in these two states.  The suit alleged the harassment included groping, sending pictures of male genitalia, propositions for sex, viewing of pornography, vulgar comments, and unwanted touching and kissing.  Going one step further, the suit also alleged that instead of the company taking corrective action when the victims complained, the victims were instead retaliated against with many having their work hours reduced or being terminated.  This alleged conduct, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, resulted in these franchisees agreeing to settle the suit for $700,000.00.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies i...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more