Skip to main content

Florida Supreme Court Rejects Miami Beach Minimum Wage Appeal


This is turning into the month of minimum wage updates, right?  On February 5th, in a 5 - 2 decision, the Florida Supreme Court dismissed an appeal over a Miami Beach minimum wage ordinance that would have raised the hourly minimum wage rate in the city up to $13.31/hour by 2021.  That ordinance, approved in 2016, would have set the hourly minimum wage rate in the city above that of the statewide rate (the statewide hourly minimum wage rate was previously set at $8.10/hour in 2016 and currently sits at $8.46/hour today).  

However, business groups and some Republicans in the state cried foul over the ordinance, pointing to a 2003 state preemption law that bars local municipalities from setting their own minimum wage rates.  Miami Beach attempted to argue that the wage hike was needed as hourly workers could not afford to make ends meet.  Subsequently, litigation commenced and Miami-Dade County Judge Peter Lopez issuing a ruling that Miami Beach’s minimum wage ordinance did indeed conflict with state preemption laws and therefore was invalid.  After the Third District Court of Appeals agreed with the lower court that state preemption laws blocked the ordinance from taking effect, minimum wage advocates turned their attention to the Florida Supreme Court in a last ditch effort to salvage the attempted wage hike.

It turns out, this legal maneuver appeared to give the ordinance a fighting chance as last August, the Florida Supreme Court voted 4 - 3 in favor of hearing the appeal.  In fact, the matter was to be considered by the Supreme Court next month.  However, the 5 - 2 decision from earlier this month reversed the Supreme Court’s prior 4 - 3 ruling and foreclosed further consideration of the ordinance.  

Readers might be scratching their heads trying to figure out what happened here.  Let us take a step back and look at the big picture.  In Florida, there is a mandatory retirement age for judges.  That resulted in Judges Barbara Pariente, R. Fred Lewis, and Peggy Quince (whom all had a more liberal tilt on the Supreme Court) being forced to retire last month.  And who got to fill these three vacancies on the Supreme Court?  Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who just so happens to be the Republican candidate for Governor elected last November.  As a result, Governor DeSantis appointed Barbara Lagoa, Robert Luck, and Carlos Muniz to the bench, which gave the revamped Florida Supreme Court a conservative majority...and enough votes to issue the 5 - 2 decision which leaves in place the Third District’s decision blocking the minimum wage ordinance.

Interesting enough, former Miami Beach Democratic Mayor Philip Levine (who spearheaded the minimum wage ordinance movement while mayor of Miami Beach in 2016) sought the Democratic party nomination for Florida Governor in 2018.  However, he fell short in the Democratic primaries, coming in third place and losing to eventual Florida Democratic Governor nominee Andrew Gillum who went on to lose to Republican Ron DeSantis.

What is next for minimum wage advocates in Miami Beach?  For the time being, the 2016 minimum wage ordinance fight is over.  With a conservative majority on the state’s Supreme Court, efforts might be better spent trying to reverse/undue the preemption laws or risk running into that seemingly insurmountable hurdle again if another city tries to raise their hourly minimum wage rates above the state rate.  Another option could be to increase the statewide minimum wage rate.  As we have seen, there appears to be at least one serious financial backer that is working to put that measure before voters in the next year or two.


For additional information:  http://www.wlrn.org/post/miami-beachs-minimum-wage-hike-shot-down-florida-supreme-court

For a copy of the Florida Supreme Court’s (brief) 5 - 2 decision:  https://efactssc-public.flcourts.org/casedocuments/2017/2284/2017-2284_disposition_145305_d25.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per