Skip to main content

Happening Today: House Education and Labor Committe Holds Hearing on Raise the Wage Act of 2019


This morning and into the afternoon, the 50 member House Education and Labor Committee is holding a hearing to hear testimony and further review the Raise the Wage Act of 2019.  In January, Democrats in the House of Representatives introduced legislation that seeks to raise the federal hourly minimum wage rate from its current rate of $7.25/hour up to $15/hour by 2024.  While Democrats appear to have the votes to get the bill out of the House, it is expected that it will face resistance from Republicans that maintain majority control of the Senate.

With this proposed legislation, several business groups have argued that increasing the federal hourly minimum wage rate to $15/hour will ultimately result in employers cutting jobs and hours to offset the rising labor costs.  While some large employers might be able to bear the brunt of this proposed wage increase, smaller businesses have expressed concern over their ability to stay open.  Notably, the Chamber of Commerce has indicated that for a federal hourly minimum wage hike to garner enough support to pass in Congress, there would likely need to be a concession given for smaller employers.

On the other hand, over 100 economists submitted a letter to President Donald Trump and suggested that even if employees have their hours cut, they "could still break even, or come out ahead, in terms of annual earnings."

These type of committee hearings allow witnesses to appear and give testimony, answer questions from members of Congress, and advocate (one way or another) for the passage or denial of legislation.  As some readers have seen, some of these hearings often turn into nothing more than an opportunity for a member of Congress to grandstand in front of the cameras.  Nevertheless, these hearings are a routine occurrence when Congress is considering a piece of legislation.

At this time, we are still very early in the process in regard to the eventual passage (or failure) of the Raise the Wage Act of 2019.  With that being said, this House Committee hearing today is the first step in moving the legislation along.  If you are free this afternoon, I suggest giving either the opening statement of House Committee Chairman Bobby Scott a read, reviewing the letter submitted by the economists, or watching the hearing and testimony itself.


For a copy of the opening statement of Chairman Scott:  https://edlabor.house.gov/imo/media/doc/ChairScottOS_MinWageHearing020719.pdf


The House Education and Labor Committee hearing:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDGkim7aaHI
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...