Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Labor Law Edition


Following former National Labor Relations Board Member Mark Gaston Pearce withdrawing last week from being reappointed to his old position, I wanted to highlight that pivotal development for readers.  With that being said, there have been quite a few other labor law related developments that are worth highlighting this week, such that I want to dedicate this post to that very topic.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Craft Breweries & Unions: The Next Frontier?

Saddle up to the bar for a minute, partner.  Alex Press at In These Times wrote an article last Friday that recognized a recent rally by workers at Anchor Brewing Company that are seeking to unionize.  Following a rally in the Mission District in San Francisco, the crowd split up to canvas the neighboring area to bring awareness to their unionization effort.  This rally came on the heels of Anchor Brewing Company receiving notice of the unionization effort by employees.  Notably, these workers are seeking to be among the first unionized craft breweries in the country.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Former National Labor Relations Board Member Pearce Withdraws His Renomination

Last Wednesday, former National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") Member Mark Gaston Pearce announced he would not seek renomination to the NLRB, following the end of his term ended last August.  NLRB Member Pearce, nominated by President Barack Obama, had played an instrumental role in many employee and labor friendly decisions from the NRLB, including the infamous Browning-Ferris joint employer decision.  When his term expired, he was renominated.  (Traditionally, the NLRB is comprised of three members from the sitting President's party with the other two members coming from the other party).  However, after his renomination sat idle in the Senate, NLRB Member Pearce stated that he was withdrawing his renomination to "remove myself from the center of a political tug of war that has spanned five months."  At this point, Republicans in the Senate have shown little inclination to move quickly on any new nominee to the NLRB.  For the time being, the NLRB has four Members, with a 3 - 1 employer friendly majority.


The NLRB & Documenting Employee Misconduct

Michael Ryan over at Labor & Employment Law Perspectives uses a recent case out of Alabama that involved the NLRB to help illustrate the point that employers would be wise to diligently document employee misconduct or be faced with an uphill battle if that employee contests a ‘negative’ employment action such as a suspension, termination, etc.  as always, every situation is different, but Michael provides some good pointers here.


BuzzFeed News Employees Intend to Form a Union

Following BuzzFeed's layoffs last month of nearly 15% of its workforce, employee's at the company's news division announced on Tuesday that they planned to form a union.  In the announcement, the organizing committee stated they had been organizing for several months and sought to unionize to bring attention to alleged unfair pay disparities, mismanaged pivots and layoffs, weak benefits, skyrocketing health insurance costs, diversity, and other related grievances.  As Jaclyn Peiser at The New York Times writes, there have been rumblings of unionization at BuzzFeed going back to 2015.  Whether this recent unionization talk amounts to anything remains to be seen.



As many readers have likely heard, Amazon announced two locations for its new HQ2 location, with one being located in Long Island City in New York.  After the announcement was made, many in the Long Island City community began to rail against the company believing that Amazon moving into their neighborhood would harm the community and its character.  Recently, labor unions have joined the fray, with the Teamsters Joint Council 16 and Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union voicing their concern with the Long Island City HQ2 location as well as with Amazon itself.  Monica Nickelsburg at GeekWire writes that the unions have expressed disapproval over the way they believe Amazon treats its workers and argue that the company has a history of anti-union behavior.  I question whether this "protest" of the Long Island City HQ2 results in Amazon pulling out of its planned location in New York.  In the interim, however, the unions' growing frustration with Amazon is starting to garner (unwanted) attention for the company.

(Special note:  I found the above article earlier this week and thought it worth highlighting.  Well, yesterday afternoon The New York Times reported that Amazon was withdrawing its plans to build the HQ2 location in Long Island City, reportedly due in part to the union backlash the company had received.  Although the GeekWire article is not necessarily timely at this point...it goes to show the effect that can come about when a union and its supporters get vocal.)


NLRB to Consider if National Labor Relations Act Covers Charter Schools

Last month, the NLRB granted a request for review by the United Federation of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL-CIO.  In doing so, the NLRB will decide whether prior precedent, which held that the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") covers charter schools, should be modified or overruled.  If the NLRB declines to exercise jurisdiction over charter schools (as many expect will happen), these unionized employees would fall outside the protection of the NLRA.  Notably NLRB Member Lauren McFerran (the "lone" employee/union friendly NLRB Member) wrote a sharp dissent in which she argued that a change in the composition of the NLRB was not grounds for overturning precedent.  Nevertheless, I think a 3-1 decision will likely be issued that finds the NLRB does not have jurisdiction over charter schools...thus taking these employees outside the scope of the NLRA.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more