Skip to main content

NLRB General Counsel Apparently Looking To Do Away With Scabby the Rat


I will be honest, the title of this post might have readers wondering who (or what) is Scabby the Rat.  For those unaware, Scabby the Rat is an inflatable 12 to 30 foot tall rat with claws raised, bloodshot eyes, and its teeth barred.  (See The New York Daily News link below for a picture of Scabby).  Scabby, who often appears at picket lines, is routinely photographed and has come to symbolize unions and their protests of employers using replacement (often referred to as scab) workers when a union strikes.  (Scabby has been around since 1990...and boasts over 8,000 Twitter followers.  Yes, really).  In fact, unions have long used inflatables to protest contractors that use non-union labor (known as secondary picketing).

For nearly three decades, courts and the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) have held that inflatables, such as Scabby, are permitted on picket lines under federal labor laws. As well, these inflatables have also been found to be symbolic speech that is protected under the First Amendment.  While some union leaders have toyed with the idea of getting rid of Scabby in recent years, there has been a groundswell of support around Scabby with many rallying around him (or is it her?).  Nevertheless, management side attorneys are known to universally despise inflatables, especially Scabby, and have long fought to bar these inflatables from picket lines.

However, word leaked in recent weeks that NLRB General Counsel Peter Robb has been looking for a case that can be used to get rid of Scabby and related inflatables on picket lines.  Apparently, Robb wants to find a case for the NLRB to issue a decision that finds it unlawful to picket, strike, or handbill with Scabby (or related inflatables) present.  Last month, Robb caught the attention of many NLRB observers when he directed agency attorneys to revive a complaint by an Illinois excavation company that the NLRB had previously dismissed.  These NLRB observers have speculated this is the case that Robb believes will result in the NLRB ultimately finding inflatables on the picket line to be unlawful.  Whether this case, or another, will pass legal muster if challenged beyond the NLRB is up for debate.  Regardless, Scabby appears to be in the crosshairs of Robb.  Stay tuned.


For additional information:  https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/death-to-scabby-trump-labor-counsel-aims-to-deflate-protest-icon

For a picture of Scabby the Rat:  https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-edit-save-scabby-20190123-story.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more