Skip to main content

From Pom Poms to the Courtroom: Dallas Cowboys Edition


Another month, and yet another N.F.L. cheerleader lawsuit has been filed in regard to Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") issues.  As readers are well aware, over the past few years, N.F.L. and N.B.A. cheerleaders have filed numerous FLSA and discrimination suits against their teams and the leagues.  For those keeping count, lawsuits have been filed against several teams including the Raiders, Bengals, Bills, Jets, Buccaneers, Raiders (again), Bucks, Saints, and Texans.  Although some of those cases have ended up settling, others have continued on without a resolution.  As I have pointed out previously, one of the sticking points with many of these FLSA suits is a provision in the employment agreement that all disputes will be resolved via arbitration...rather than in court.

With that being said, last week, a former Dallas Cowboys cheerleader filed suit against the team and alleged that the Cowboys failed to pay her minimum wage and overtime.  The cheerleader, Erika Wilkins, claims she was paid $8/hour for practices and a flat rate for games and other appearances but was not paid for all the hours she worked (which included practices, training, and filming for the CMT show Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders:  Making the Team).  As a result, Wilkins argues that she is owed unpaid overtime wage, minimum wages, and all other available damages.

This suit is interesting, albeit a bit different than other related cheerleader lawsuits, in so much that Wilkins alleges that the team's mascot, Rowdy, makes $25/hour and about $65,000.00 per year plus commission.  Wilkins argues that Rowdy's job required "equal skill, effort, and responsibility under similar working conditions..."  This is an interesting argument, as Wilkins is attempting to draw a line between what the mascot (played by a male) makes in comparison to the all female cheerleading group in an attempt to establish a violation of the Equal Pay Act.  (For those needing a refresher, the Equal Pay Act, in relevant parts, states that "No employer...shall discriminate...between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees...at a rate less than which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex...for equal work on jobs, the performance of which require equal skill, effort, and responsibility...").

Several former Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders have come out in the past few days in support of the team and somewhat critical of Wilkins.  I link readers to the below article to see some of what is being said in regard to this lawsuit.  For the time being, the team itself has not commented on the lawsuit.


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more