Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: Right to Work Edition


The U.S. Supreme Court made its long awaited ruling in Janus v. AFSCME earlier this week.  That development needs no introduction as readers have surely heard about the Court's decision and seen the immediate implications of what that ruling could mean for labor unions.  Rather than rehash that decision just a few days later, I thought it would be appropriate to instead look at a few other right to work matters pending across the country.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Could Supporters of a Right to Work Bill In New Hampshire Use Janus As a Springboard?

Todd Bookman wrote a brief note that highlighted a somewhat renewed sense of optimism among Republicans in New Hampshire that have thus far failed to get a right to work bill passed in the state.  Although several attempts have been made in the past few years (despite appearing to have the votes to pass a bill), New Hampshire has yet to join the growing ranks of right to work states.  Could the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Janus be the shot in the arm to finally get a statewide law passed?  Perhaps.  But as Bookman notes, advocates of right to work in New Hampshire are feeling a lot more optimistic this week.


Ahead of August Vote on Right to Work in Missouri, Increase in Money To Support/Contest Measure Continues

Readers are likely well aware that the ongoing fight to turn Missouri into a right to work state has been a long and winding road.  Now that voters in the state will have an opportunity to vote on the right to work measure in August, supporters and opponents of right to work have begun to dig in and increase their spending in an effort to sway voters.  As Allison Kite at The Kansas City Star writes, nearly $14 million has been raised so far (which apparently tops a fundraising campaign a few years ago to increase cigarette tax) with still about another month to go before voters head to the poll.  Besides the ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this week, this is one of the other hot button employment and labor law issues to keep an eye on this summer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more