Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Ban the box laws have become commonplace across the country over the past few years.  However, a frequent criticism is that these laws often are not enforced.  Well lo and behold, we have at least one Attorney General that has started to fine employers for not complying with the state's ban the box law.  Employers (especially those in Massachusetts) should take note of the below article...

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Lowe's Aggressively Pushes Mandatory Arbitration Agreements

Dave Jamieson recently wrote an article over at The Huffington Post in which he noted that Lowe's has started to require its store managers to sign mandatory arbitration agreements in order to be eligible to receive their bonuses (and even continue employment with the company).  These mandatory arbitration agreements require store managers to agree to not take Lowe's to court or join class actions against the company and instead individually take any disputes with the company to binding arbitration.  Readers will recall that the U.S. Supreme Court recently upheld the lawfulness of these mandatory arbitration agreements that many employers have wanted to use.  Lowe's is one of the primary employers that has really taken this ruling and 'run' with it.  The question is which employer will be next to follow suit?


Massachusetts AG Begins to Enforce the State's Ban the Box Law

For those not aware, Massachusetts passed a law in 2010 that prohibited most employers from asking job applicants about their criminal history on an initial employment application.  Earlier this week, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey announced that agreements had been reached with four national employers that were found to be in violation of the state's ban the box law (with fines being assessed in the amount of approximately $5,000.00/employer).  As well, seventeen local businesses were given a warning that they were in violation of the ban the box law and were ordered to comply with the law.  Many critics of ban the box laws across the country have questioned whether the laws would actually be enforced or whether employers would be given a "free pass".  Employers in the state should take note, it appears the AG is beginning to hold employers accountable.  This is as good of a time as any to ensure your hiring/application process is in compliance with the ban the box law.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more