Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


With nearly 200 posts this year, we have certainly run the gamut on employment and labor law developments, ranging from minimum wage hikes, President Donald Trump's first nominee for Labor Secretary unexpectedly withdrawing, right to work developments (including right to work zones), increased attention on sexual harassment claims in the workplace, the National Labor Relations Board taking on a 3 - 2 Republican majority, and the subsequent reversal of the 2015 Browning-Ferris joint employer decision.

Of course, that is not even touching on the many decisions handed down by courts across the country over the past twelve months that addressed whether an employer discriminated against an employee with a medical marijuana card simply because she was a card holder (Callaghan v. Darlington Fabrics),  yet another case that considered if time spent in security screenings after clocking out was compensable time (Vance v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al.), a Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals case that addressed whether an employer unlawfully failed to accommodate an employee that asked for a religious accommodation request after objecting to the use of a hand scanner at work that interfered with the employee's religious beliefs (EEOC v. CONSOL Energy, Inc.), and a case that considered if rescinding an offer of employment because an applicant engaged in protected activity was unlawful...spoiler alert, it was (Linkletter v. Western & Southern Financial Group, Inc.), among many other noteworthy cases.

Many thanks to all the readers for following along throughout the many developments this year.  I am looking forward to the new year ahead with another wide range of employment and labor law developments to share.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Microsoft Eliminates Forced Arbitration Agreements For Sexual Harassment Claims

A few weeks ago, Microsoft made what I consider to be a major announcement with its decision to no longer require employees to pursue sexual harassment claims via arbitration (rather than in court.)  Going one step further, the company also endorsed a bill introduced in the U.S. Congress by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (Democrat from New York) and Senator Lindsey Graham (Republican from South Carolina) that would prohibit companies from contractually requiring employees to settle these types of cases behind closed doors in arbitration.  As noted by Nick Wingfield and Jessica Silver-Greenberg at The New York Times, Microsoft becomes one of the first major companies to directly address sexual harassment policies in its workplace.


New Year, New Wage: A Breakdown of Minimum Wage Hikes in 2018

For many readers, the past year has been somewhat difficult (if not confusing) trying to follow the range of (proposed) minimum wage hikes across the country.  Do not worry, CNN Money recently put out a concise breakdown of minimum wage hikes in the coming year for many cities and states.  Something tells me we are likely to see many more cities and states added to this list over the coming twelve months.


Unions Are Spending Big Money to Fight Missouri Right to Work Law

After many failed attempts, in February, Republicans in Missouri were able to approve a right to work bill that Republican Governor Eric Greitens signed.  However, opponents of the right to work law mobilized and collected enough signatures to suspend the law and place it on the 2018 ballot for Missouri voters to decide upon.  Given how proactive opponents of the right to work legislation have been, it should come as little surprise that unions have started to ramp up spending in the state to contest the law ahead of next year's vote.  In fact, over the past few months, nearly $2 million has poured into efforts to defeat the right to work law.  This one still has a long ways to go until election day next November, but this referendum in Missouri could prove to be a seminal moment for right to work laws.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per