Skip to main content

The Great EEOC Roundup: December Edition


As always, there are some recent EEOC cases that jump out at me when I review developments on that front.  Below are a couple EEOC cases and settlements that stand out.


Bojangles' to Pay $15,000 to Settle Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Suit

Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc. had a lawsuit filed against it in which the EEOC alleged that the company unlawfully subjected a transgender employee to a hostile work environment because of gender identity and then unlawfully terminated the employee for reporting the sexual harassment.  The suit alleged that Jonathan (De'Ashia) Wolfe, a transgender employee that worked at a Bojangles' location, was repeatedly subjected to offensive comments about her gender identity and appearance.  In fact, managers and assistant managers apparently demanded Wolfe behave and groom in ways that were stereotypically male (since Wolfe was born male), although Wolfe identified as a woman.  Although Wolfe reported the comments on several occasions, the harassment continued and Wolfe was subsequently terminated thereafter.  This alleged conduct is in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which protects employees from sex discrimination (including harassment based upon gender identity and sexual orientation) and prohibits employers from retaliating against employees that complain about this discrimination.


Trinity Hospital to Pay $95,000 to Settle Pregnancy Discrimination & Disability Discrimination Suit

Recently, the EEOC announced that Trinity Health (d/b/a Trinity Hospital) would pay $95,000.00 to settle a pregnancy discrimination and disability discrimination claim suit filed by a pregnant nurse that had lifting restrictions because of a pregnancy related health condition.  In lieu of providing light duty work to the nurse as she requested, Trinity terminated her.  The suit alleged that Trinity violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act by not providing the nurse with accommodations for her lifting restrictions although evidence had been presented which showed that Trinity had provided light duty work to other nurses that were injured on the job. As noted, if an employer is accommodating an employee with restrictions that have arisen from a work place related injury, there may be a duty to provide that same accommodation to an employee with a restriction that has arisen out of a pregnancy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more