Skip to main content

Massachusetts Voters Likely To Weigh In On Minimum Wage Hike and Paid Leave in 2018


Late last month, Raise Up Massachusetts announced that it collected enough signatures to get two measures on the ballot in 2018, one that would raise the hourly minimum wage rate in the state and another that would require employers to offer paid family and medical leave.  (Raise Up Massachusetts is a coalition of labor, religious, and community groups).  The minimum wage proposal seeks to raise the hourly minimum wage rate in the state from its current rate of $11/hour up to $15/hour by 2022.  The paid family and medical leave proposal would create a program that would require employers to offer most employees 16 weeks of paid leave to care for a new child or to care for a sick family member.  This proposal would also provide 26 weeks of leave for workers recovering from an illness.

For those unfamiliar with the requirements to get a ballot measure approved, Massachusetts requires the signatures of 64,750 registered Massachusetts voters to get the measure on a ballot.  Raise Up Massachusetts announced that it had collected 138,924 signatures for the minimum wage proposal and 135,470 signatures for the paid family and medical leave proposal.  (It is a good idea to get more signatures than necessary in case some signatures are disputed, illegible, not signed by registered voters, etc.  Having "extra" signatures in support of a ballot measure provides some wiggle room in case the Secretary of State does not approve some signatures).  

At this stage, Raise Up Massachusetts is expected to submit the signatures to the Massachusetts Secretary of State tomorrow.  Once that is done, the Secretary of State will then inspect the signatures and determine if the required 64,750 signatures have been submitted.  Assuming that occurs, I would expect to see both measures on the ballot in 2018.  Stay tuned.


For additional information:  https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2017/11/30/wage-paid-leave-proposals-have-signatures-to-get.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more