Skip to main content

Department of Labor Proposes Rescinding Obama Era Tip Pool Rule


Yesterday, the Department of Labor announced a proposed rule that would rescind an Obama era tip pool rule that prevented employers from redistributing servers' tips to back of the house employees.  

Federal law has long held that employers cannot force employees to divide their tips with other employees if the tipped employees do not receive a base pay of at least the federal minimum wage.  The tip pool rule, in place since 2011, expanded this protection to all tipped workers and prevented employers from dividing tips and giving a cut to kitchen staff and others that do not directly receive tips.  Under the rule as enacted during President Barack Obama's administration, the tips were declared the property of the workers that collected them regardless of the base pay rate of the employee.

Under the proposal from the Department of Labor announced yesterday, this rescission of tip pool rule would apply only to employees already making at least the federal minimum wage, $7.25/hour, and not to "tip credit" employees whose base pay is below the federal minimum wage.  (In essence, it would put things back in place as they were before the Obama era tip pool rule came into effect in 2011).  

In its press release, the Department of Labor championed this proposal as an effort to decrease wage disparity between tipped and non-tipped workers (something I am inclined to agree with.)  However, critics have been quick to argue that all tips belong to the workers that earned them and any attempts to redistribute tips to back of the house employees would be "straight up stealing".  Assuming this proposal goes into effect, I would expect some group to make a legal challenge and fight the effort in court.  Stay tuned.



For a copy of the Department of Labor press release:  https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20171204

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more