Skip to main content

Department of Labor Proposes Rescinding Obama Era Tip Pool Rule


Yesterday, the Department of Labor announced a proposed rule that would rescind an Obama era tip pool rule that prevented employers from redistributing servers' tips to back of the house employees.  

Federal law has long held that employers cannot force employees to divide their tips with other employees if the tipped employees do not receive a base pay of at least the federal minimum wage.  The tip pool rule, in place since 2011, expanded this protection to all tipped workers and prevented employers from dividing tips and giving a cut to kitchen staff and others that do not directly receive tips.  Under the rule as enacted during President Barack Obama's administration, the tips were declared the property of the workers that collected them regardless of the base pay rate of the employee.

Under the proposal from the Department of Labor announced yesterday, this rescission of tip pool rule would apply only to employees already making at least the federal minimum wage, $7.25/hour, and not to "tip credit" employees whose base pay is below the federal minimum wage.  (In essence, it would put things back in place as they were before the Obama era tip pool rule came into effect in 2011).  

In its press release, the Department of Labor championed this proposal as an effort to decrease wage disparity between tipped and non-tipped workers (something I am inclined to agree with.)  However, critics have been quick to argue that all tips belong to the workers that earned them and any attempts to redistribute tips to back of the house employees would be "straight up stealing".  Assuming this proposal goes into effect, I would expect some group to make a legal challenge and fight the effort in court.  Stay tuned.



For a copy of the Department of Labor press release:  https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20171204

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...