Skip to main content

Updated: Federal Judge Blocks Implementation of New Overtime Regulation


In what can only be considered another blow to President Obama's legacy, yesterday, Judge Mazzant III of the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide injunction which will block the implementation of the new overtime regulation previously announced earlier this year.  The regulation, which was set to take effect December 1, would have required employers to pay time and a half to employees who worked more than 40 hours in a week and earned less than $47,476.00/year (note, this was in increase over the current threshold of $23,660.00/year).

Judge Mazaant III held that the Obama administration had exceed its authority by raising the overtime salary limit so significantly.  In this instance, the judge held there was nothing in the Fair Labor Standards Act which indicated that Congress intended the U.S. Department of Labor to define exemptions in the Act with respect to a minimum salary level (which was in fact what the Department of Labor was attempting to do with the new overtime regulation).  

Pro-business groups and Republicans have long advocated for this sort of injunction to stop the implementation of the new regulation, and cheered yesterday's ruling.  The Department of Labor indicated it "strongly disagreed" with the decision and would consider all available legal options.  With that being said, I am not sure the Department of Labor will ultimately prevail (as an incoming Republican President and Congress will likely take steps to ensure this new regulation does not become a reality).

There is a big of a bright spot for supporters of the new overtime regulation:  The injunction is temporary (unlike the permanent injunction that was handed down recently in regard to implementation of the "persuader rule").  However, I would expect this judge to strike down the regulation entirely if it gets to that point.  In the meantime, the new overtime regulation is on hold.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more