Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: A Look Back Edition


On Wednesday, there was major news out of the Northern District of Texas when Judge Sam Cummings issued a permanent injunction to block the "persuader rule".  For those unfamiliar with the "persuader rule", this was a regulation pushed by the Obama administration which would have imposed significant reporting requirements that would mandate employers or consultants to disclose any arrangement to persuade employees in regard to the right to organize or collectively bargain.  It goes without saying that this is quite a development and therefore is one of the main articles I wanted to highlight this week.

As always, below are several articles that caught my eye this week.



Back in September, a temporary injunction was granted by Judge Cummings to block the "persuader rule" and the Department of Labor announced it would appeal the ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.  It turns out that Judge Cummings granted a permanent injunction on Wednesday which could be the death knell for the "persuader rule" as we know it.  As Daniel Fisher over at Forbes writes, given the fact that the Department of Labor's appeal probably will not be successful with the Fifth Circuit (and might not even survive an appeal to the United States Supreme Court...which Donald Trump could influence with pro-business justices), this might be the end of the "persuader rule."

In May, I had pointed readers to a recent class action lawsuit filed against Uber in which Uber drivers claim they were misidentified as independent contractors (rather than employees), and therefore were entitled to unpaid wages.  In recent weeks, news has come from across the pond that Uber drivers in England and Wales have won the right to be classified as workers (employees) rather than self-employed contractors (independent contractors).  Natasha Lomas over at Tech Crunch details how an employment tribunal held that these Uber drivers are now entitled to holiday pay, paid rest breaks, and the National Minimum Wage.  Of course, Uber has indicated they will appeal...but this ruling certainly gives a glimmer of hope to Uber drivers in the U.S. who continue their fight to be classified as employees.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more