Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: A Look Back Edition


On Wednesday, there was major news out of the Northern District of Texas when Judge Sam Cummings issued a permanent injunction to block the "persuader rule".  For those unfamiliar with the "persuader rule", this was a regulation pushed by the Obama administration which would have imposed significant reporting requirements that would mandate employers or consultants to disclose any arrangement to persuade employees in regard to the right to organize or collectively bargain.  It goes without saying that this is quite a development and therefore is one of the main articles I wanted to highlight this week.

As always, below are several articles that caught my eye this week.



Back in September, a temporary injunction was granted by Judge Cummings to block the "persuader rule" and the Department of Labor announced it would appeal the ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.  It turns out that Judge Cummings granted a permanent injunction on Wednesday which could be the death knell for the "persuader rule" as we know it.  As Daniel Fisher over at Forbes writes, given the fact that the Department of Labor's appeal probably will not be successful with the Fifth Circuit (and might not even survive an appeal to the United States Supreme Court...which Donald Trump could influence with pro-business justices), this might be the end of the "persuader rule."

In May, I had pointed readers to a recent class action lawsuit filed against Uber in which Uber drivers claim they were misidentified as independent contractors (rather than employees), and therefore were entitled to unpaid wages.  In recent weeks, news has come from across the pond that Uber drivers in England and Wales have won the right to be classified as workers (employees) rather than self-employed contractors (independent contractors).  Natasha Lomas over at Tech Crunch details how an employment tribunal held that these Uber drivers are now entitled to holiday pay, paid rest breaks, and the National Minimum Wage.  Of course, Uber has indicated they will appeal...but this ruling certainly gives a glimmer of hope to Uber drivers in the U.S. who continue their fight to be classified as employees.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...