Skip to main content

Updated: San Jose City Council Approves $15/Hour Minimum Wage Hike By January 1, 2019


Yesterday, I had pointed readers to a pending vote by the San Jose City Council in regard to whether to accelerate a minimum wake hike for workers in the city.  While other cities in Santa Clara County had approved measures for an accelerated minimum wage hike (ahead of the statewide $15/hour minimum wage rate set to take effect in 2022), there was some mystery as to whether San Jose would follow suit.  While there had been several competing proposals to raise the minimum wage rate to $15/hour by January 1, 2019 or July 1, 2019, there was no guarantee the City Council would approve any measure.

It turns out, the City Council approved the more ambitious measure and approved a plan to raise the minimum wage rate for workers in the city to $15/hour by January 1, 2019.  Note, this wage hike will be phased in as follows:  $12/hour in 2017, $13.50/hour in 2018, and $15/hour in 2019.  An automatic cost of living increase will go into effect every year thereafter.  In addition, this minimum wage increase is expected to impact nearly 115,000 workers in the city.  

As I mentioned yesterday, this is certainly a win for hourly workers in San Jose.  I think it was more likely than not that the $15/hour wage rate would go into effect before 2022 (given that other cities in Santa Clara County had pushed for an accelerated timeframe), but it was not a sure thing given that several proposals had a wide range of support and there was no guarantee that any one proposal would garner enough support to pass.


For additional information:  http://www.ktvu.com/news/217790942-story

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more