Skip to main content

Updated: Federal Judge Blocks Implementation of New Overtime Regulation


In what can only be considered another blow to President Obama's legacy, yesterday, Judge Mazzant III of the Eastern District of Texas issued a nationwide injunction which will block the implementation of the new overtime regulation previously announced earlier this year.  The regulation, which was set to take effect December 1, would have required employers to pay time and a half to employees who worked more than 40 hours in a week and earned less than $47,476.00/year (note, this was in increase over the current threshold of $23,660.00/year).

Judge Mazaant III held that the Obama administration had exceed its authority by raising the overtime salary limit so significantly.  In this instance, the judge held there was nothing in the Fair Labor Standards Act which indicated that Congress intended the U.S. Department of Labor to define exemptions in the Act with respect to a minimum salary level (which was in fact what the Department of Labor was attempting to do with the new overtime regulation).  

Pro-business groups and Republicans have long advocated for this sort of injunction to stop the implementation of the new regulation, and cheered yesterday's ruling.  The Department of Labor indicated it "strongly disagreed" with the decision and would consider all available legal options.  With that being said, I am not sure the Department of Labor will ultimately prevail (as an incoming Republican President and Congress will likely take steps to ensure this new regulation does not become a reality).

There is a big of a bright spot for supporters of the new overtime regulation:  The injunction is temporary (unlike the permanent injunction that was handed down recently in regard to implementation of the "persuader rule").  However, I would expect this judge to strike down the regulation entirely if it gets to that point.  In the meantime, the new overtime regulation is on hold.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more