Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Tough to narrow things down this week as I came across several articles that directly tie into previous topics I have written.  In particular, I would point readers to the development in Seattle in regard to predictable schedules.  I do not think this is the last time we have seen this type of legislation be approved...the only question is what city (or state) will follow suit.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


A Closer Look at the Predictable Schedules Legislation Approved in Seattle

A few weeks ago, I had pointed out that Seattle and New York City were working towards passing predictable schedules legislation for hourly workers.  This type of legislation (often referred to as "secure scheduling") requires employers to post schedules in advance which allows their employees to have better control over their work/life balance.  If an employer changes the work schedule on short notice, they can be subjected to fines or the employees can be entitled to additional pay.  Andrea Calem and Susan Wiltsie have a good look at the recent development in Seattle that I think is well worth a read.


Florida Minimum Wage Going Up to $8.10/Hour in 2017

As Marcia Heroux Pounds over at the SunSentinel writes, On January 1, 2017, the hourly minimum wage rate in Florida will go up $.05 from $8.05/hour to $8.10/hour.  As with other states such as Ohio, Washington, and New Jersey, Florida recalculates its minimum wage rate every year based upon the Consumer Price Index.  Although $8.10/hour is still a far cry from a $12 or $15/hour wage rate that many would like to see...it is a (small) step in the right direction for the time being.


Uber Ordered to Comply With NLRB Subpoenas

In mid October, a federal magistrate judge ordered Uber to comply with two NLRB subpoenas that relate to an investigation into unfair labor practice charges that have been lodged against the company.  In particular, the allegations claim that Uber violated the NLRA by forcing drivers to sign a licensing agreement with a mandatory arbitration policy that waives a driver's right to bring a class or collective claim.  Interesting development, to say the least.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more