Skip to main content

Pennsylvania Democratic Campaign Organizer Brings FLSA Suit Against DNC


Thankfully, this is not a discussion on the electoral college, popular votes, transition teams, 2020 presidential hopefuls, etc.  Instead, I wanted to highlight a lawsuit that was recently filed by Democratic campaign organizer who claims that she (and others) were not paid overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act.

According to the campaign organizer, she and others often worked 80 to 90 hours a week, but were not paid overtime by the Pennsylvania Democratic Committee (and the Democratic National Committee).  She has stated that after getting hired in June, she was to assist in a national effort to help the Democratic ground game drive up numbers on election day.  She spent time on the phone, solicited volunteers, assisted voters with registering, etc.  However, in August she decided to quit after continually putting in 12 to 14 hour days.  

On November 9, suit was filed in Philadelphia and seeks class action status on behalf of all DNC campaign organizers within the past 3 years.  According to the suit, these campaign organizers were improperly classified as exempt employees (and therefore barred from receiving overtime pay under the FLSA).

Interesting to note that some campaign operatives (not necessarily affiliated with Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump's campaigns) have stated that it is common, if not understood, that these campaign jobs are often 80 to 100 hour a week jobs and do not pay overtime.  That does not make this practice legal (if it is found the campaign organizers were improperly classified), but still interesting to see how this is considered "routine".



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...