Skip to main content

An In Depth Look at the New Department of Labor Overtime Rules


By now, many readers will have likely heard about the new overtime rules announced by the Department of Labor recently.  It goes without saying that this new rule will likely impact many employers and employees across the country when it goes into effect on December 1, 2016.  Although I had written about the new overtime rules a few weeks ago, I wanted to take a minute to highlight a couple articles that I think readers will find useful on the topic.  This will serve as a mini "What I've Been Reading This Week".


Millions Set to Benefit From New Overtime Rules

I think the title says it all, millions of employees across the country will likely stand to benefit from the new Department of Labor overtime rules.  While many employees will likely benefit from higher pay as a result of the new rules, employers will likely cast an unfavorable eye in anticipation of preparing for the December 1 implementation of the new rules.  This article is well worth a review to catch the "highlights" of the new rules.

Economist Ross Eisenbrey Offers Thoughts on the New Overtime Rules

Ross Eisenbrey, the vice president of the Economic Policy Institute, had previously fought the President George W. Bush administration in regard to overtime rules and had proposed updating the rule in a transition memo to President Obama back in 2008.  This article from The American Prospect includes a discussion with Eisenbrey and gets his thoughts on the vast impact of the Department of Labor's new overtime rules.  Well worth a read.

The Impact the New Overtime Rules Will Have on Nonprofits

Stuart Mitchell over at The Huffington Post penned an article on how the new overtime rules will impact nonprofits.  In his view, the new overtime rules will actually strengthen nonprofits.  Interesting article from a writer who has a background in the inner workings of nonprofits.



I think it is also important for readers to get a feel for how these new overtime rules could impact employers and certain industries across the country.


New FLSA Salary Thresholds Will Affect California Employers: A Closer Look

Colleen Regan over at The California Peculiarities Employment Law Blog has a well thought out article on how the new FLSA salary thresholds will affect California employers.  In particular, note Colleen's analysis of how this will impact part time exempt employees in the state.

Texas Service Sector Braces For New Overtime Rules

As My San Antonio notes, in the view of many business owners in the service sector, the new rules could negatively impact their ability to do business come December 1.  When the new rules go into effect, it is thought that many employees in the service sector would become nonexempt (and therefore result in an increased labor cost that is passed onto the employer).

Florida Employees Likely to Benefit From New Overtime Rules

The Tampa Bay Times points out that with the implementation of the new overtime rules, approximately 331,000 employees will likely be impacted in Florida.  Given the industries typically associated with Florida (tourism, hotels, amusement parks, etc), many employees in the state will likely stand to benefit from these new overtime rules.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per