Skip to main content

Updated: Texas Judge Blocks Implementation of Dept. of Labor's "Persuader Rule"


Back in April, I had noted that the Department of Labor issued a publication of the new "Persuader Rule".  That rule would require extensive disclosures from employers or consultants to report any arrangement to persuade employees in regard to the right to organize or collectively bargain.  Many in the labor field were taken aback by the far reaching impact this new rule would have.  

At the time, I pointed out that several cases had been filed to contest the Persuader Rule.  Earlier this week, a federal judge in the Northern District of Texas issued a nationwide injunction that blocks the implementation of the Persuader Rule...for the time being.  In the order, the Court wrote that the National Federation of Independent Business (among other plaintiffs) that had filed suit to challenge the rule were likely to succeed on their claims that the Department of Labor exceeded its authority and promulgated a rule that was arbitrary, vague, and violated federal law and the Constitution.  

The Court further held that the plaintiffs were likely to suffer irreparable harm if the Persuader Rule went into effect, as planned, and that a nationwide injunction was necessary because the plaintiffs (and intervenors) consisted of multiple states along with business groups with members in all fifty states.

Interesting to note that earlier this month, however, a federal court in Minnesota that heard a similar challenge declined to grant an injunction to block implementation of the Persuader Rule.  It appears these plaintiffs in the Texas case have had better luck on the issue...so far.  Of course, the dual outcome of the issue could result in the issue working its way through the courts of appeals and ultimately all the way up to the United States Supreme Court.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more