Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


It was difficult to narrow things down this week as I came across several great articles that I thought readers would appreciate reading.  In particular, I want to highlight the article on USERRA.  Given the ongoing war on terror, I think many employers will continue to be confronted with USERRA issues.  This particular article highlights one of the finer points of that Act.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


EEOC Issues Final Rules for Wellness Programs Under the ADA and GINA

Last month, the EEOC issued a final rule for employer wellness programs under the ADA ("Americans with Disabilities Act") and GINA ("Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act").  The California Labor & Employment Law Blog posted the final rules that I think readers should take a look at.  While this may not impact everyone, it is worth a brief review at the very least.


Reminder: An USERRA Cause of Action Requires An Adverse Employment Action

The Orrick Employment Law and Litigation Blog noted out one of the finer points of the United Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA") in so much that an adverse employment action is required for this cause of action to proceed.  I wanted to highlight this article for that reason (especially as it ties in a recent case out of a District Court in Colorado from earlier this year on the matter) as well as to give readers a reminder of some of the unique aspects of USERRA.


President Obama Signs Into Law The Defend Trade Secrets Act

The Non-Compete and Trade Secrets Report recently wrote a thorough article on the passage of The Defend Trade Secrets Act that President Obama signed into law.  As a result of the passage of this Act, for the first time, there will be a federal private right of action for misappropriation of trade secrets.  This is a huge development and something that readers should note!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more