Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Election Roundup


A few readers might have heard about an election that happened earlier this week.  I think that got a little bit of press.  For those looking for an in depth analysis of Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton, I will refer you to NPR, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, etc, etc.  In this instance, I wanted to take a moment to highlight a few of the ballot initiatives that were before voters on November 8th.  There were pretty much two big employment and labor law measures on ballots across the country on Tuesday:  Minimum wage and right to work.  Since minimum wage tends to be more of a hot button issue across the country (and got more national attention), I think it is appropriate to lead off with that. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Readers might remember an article I posted recently on the recent influx of money into the minimum wage fights leading up to November 8th.  It looks like that money paid off, as Arizona, Colorado, Maine, and Washington all approved minimum wage hikes.  As for South Dakota, voters in that state declined to lower the minimum wage rate for workers under the age of 18.  Interesting to see how many other states follow suit in the coming election cycles and choose to place minimum wage ballot initiatives on the ballots...

Arizona Voters Approve Higher Minimum Wage Rate

As Alexandra Zavis writes over at The Los Angeles Times, Arizona voters approved Proposition 206 by a 59% to 41% margin.  The state's minimum wage rate will rise to $12/hour by 2020 and guarantee paid sick time off from work.

Colorado Voters Approve Higher Minimum Wage Rate

Aldo Svaldi over at The Denver Post notes that Colorado voters approved Amendment 20 by a 55% to 45% margin.  The state's minimum wage rate will rise to $12/hour by 2020.

Maine Voters Approve Higher Minimum Wage Rate

J. Craig Anderson at The Portland Press Herald detailed the fact that on Tuesday, Maine voters approved Question 4 by a 55.5% to 45.5% margin.  The state's minimum wage rate will rise to $12/hour by 2020 and subsequent wage hikes will be tied to the consumer price index of inflation.

Washington Voters Approve Higher Minimum Wage Rate

Over at The Seattle Times, Janet I. Tu writes that Washington voters approved Initiative 1433 by a 60% to 40% margin.  The state's minimum wage rate will rise to $13.50/hour by 2020 and guarantee paid sick time off from work.

South Dakota Voters Decline to Lower Minimum Wage Rate

ABC Kota in Rapid City indicated that South Dakota voters declined to support Referred Law 20 which would have lowered the minimum wage rate from $8.50/hour to $7.50/hour for any worker under the age of 18.


As for the other big employment and labor law topic, right to work was on a couple ballots across the country.  While the more liberal leaning Virginia declined to approve an amendment to the state's constitution to include right to work, Alabama voters chose to include the state's right to work law in the constitution.  I would not necessarily call either vote surprising.  But it is still interesting to note the somewhat close margin in which Virginia voters rejected the measure.  Might not be the last time that measure comes before voters in the state.


Virginia Voters Decline to Write Right to Work Law Into State Constitution

NBC4 in Washington reported that by a 53% to 47% vote, voters in Virginia declined to include Virginia's current right to work law as an amendment to the state's constitution.  This does not mean that Virginia is no longer a right to work state...it simply means that the constitution will not be amended to include this law.

Alabama Voters Approve Right to Work Amendment In State Constitution

Sean Higgins over at The Washington Examiner noted that voters in the state approved Amendment 8 by a 70% to 30% margin, which will amend the state's constitution to include the right to work law.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more