Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


I came across a couple articles this week in relation to hourly pay that I want to bring to the attention of readers.  In regard to the first article, even for those readers that are not in California (or do not deal with California employment matters), it is still worth paging through this article for an in depth dialogue on the benefits/drawbacks of pinning wage hikes to rising inflation rates.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Potential $15.50/Hour Wage Rate in California: Good or Bad?

It is widely expected the the statewide hourly minimum wage rate in California will rise to $15.50/hour in January, triggered in part because of rising inflation.  (Currently, employers with at least 25 workers must pay at least $15/hour.  Employers with less than 25 workers must pay at least $14/hour.  By 2023, all employers will be required to pay their workers at least $15/hour.  However, there is a trigger for a quicker wage hike in the event that inflation rise above 7%.)  The San Diego Union Tribune recently conducted a round table to address whether this potential wage hike will be a benefit or burden to employers and employees alike in the state.  I encourage readers to page through this article for a more in depth discussion of the matter.


Apple to Raise Retail Pay to $22/Hour

Earlier this week, it was announced that Apple would raise the hourly pay rate for its retail workers to at least $22/hour, up from $20/hour.  Readers will likely recall that there have been several recent actions taken by Apple retail workers to unionize.  Part of those unionization efforts have focused on a desire for increased pay.  Will Apple’s move to boost hourly wages for its retail workers curb those unionization efforts?  Probably not, but it might at least slow that unionization momentum just a bit.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more