Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Pardon the brief note this week, but I found myself tied up with a few projects that left me with little time to page through articles.  With that being said there are two updates n a minimum wage and labor law related topic that are worth highlighting.  I encourage readers to take a few minutes and page through these two updates.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Hawaii: The First State With an $18/Hour Minimum Wage Rate?

As The Maui News reported earlier this week, the Hawaii Legislature approved legislation that will raise the state’s minimum wage rate to $18/hour by 2028.  The bill now goes to the desk of Governor David Ige who has previously indicated he supports a $18/hour wage rate.  Within 6 years time, Hawaii should have the highest minimum wage rate.  However, with some states having a plan in place to increase wage rates with inflation, it is possible that by 2028, other states will have an $18/hour (or higher wage rate.)


Starbucks to Hike Wages & Offer Additional Training For (Some) Workers

As Amelia Lucas at CNBC reports, Starbucks has announced that it will hike wages and offer increased training for its workers.  However, a caveat exists:  Those stores that have voted to unionize will not see these changes.  For those wondering why these unionized stores will not realize the same benefit as those stores which have not unionized, it is quite simple.  Those stores that have unionized have a union that must negotiate any changes in the condition of employment (such as wage hikes).  Starbucks cannot unilaterally impose these changes without bargaining with the union.  For the time being, this is one way that Starbucks is attempting to fight back against the growing unionization sweeping its company.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more