Skip to main content

USWNT & USMNT Reach Deal With US Soccer Federation For Equal Pay


Last week, it was announced that the union representing the U.S. Men’s National and U.S. Women’s National soccer teams had reached a deal with the U.S. Soccer Federation in which both the Men’s and Women’s teams will be paid equally, including for World Cup bonuses.

Readers might recall that there had been a prolonged and drawn out legal battle by the U.S. Women’s National soccer team against the U.S. Soccer Federation as these female players sought higher pay and more equal benefits compared to their male counterparts.  While that legal fight had finally reached its conclusion, last week’s victory in regard to the terms of the new collective bargaining agreement is nothing short of a win.

In part, the bonuses paid to teams in both the men’s and women’s World Cup will be put into a pool and split evenly among the Men’s and Women’s National teams.  (Of note, the total bonus pool for teams in the men’s 2022 Qatar World Cup is to be in the ballpark of $400 million.  Conversely, the total bonus pool for teams in the women’s 2023 Australia World Cup will be around $60 million.  While the total bonuses paid to the U.S. Men’s and Women’s National teams is not set at this time, with both the U.S. Men’s and Women’s National teams now being split evenly, the Men’s National team is giving up a potentially significant portion of their bonus pool that had previously not been split with the Women’s National team.)

As well, both the Men’s and Women’s National teams will now have identical performance based bonuses.

These new collective bargaining agreements are set to go into effect on June 1st and will remain in place until 2028.


For additional information:  https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/soccer/2022/05/18/us-soccer-cba-deal-explainer-womens-mens/9819845002/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more