Skip to main content

House of Representatives Gives Greenlight For Unionization By Capitol Hill Staffers


Last week, the U.S. House of Representatives approved a resolution by a vote of 217 - 202 that will allow Capitol Hill staffers (in the House, but not the Senate) to unionize without fear of retaliation.

The House had previously allowed staffers to unionize but there was no framework in place to protect them from retaliation if they did in fact move to unionize.  With last week’s resolution, staffers will now be able to unionize and hold a vote if at least 30% of workers in a bargaining unit (each Congressional office) support a vote.  In effect, it is quite likely (if not a certainty) that some staffers will vote to unionize while peers in neighboring Congressional offices do not vote to unionize.  This will lead to somewhat of a haphazard unionization on Capitol Hill.

If staffers successfully vote to unionize, they will be able to have a union bargain on a contract on their behalf.  As has been reported, alleged poor working conditions among some Congressional staffers had recently spurred renewed efforts on Capitol Hill to provide staffers with this ability to unionize without retaliation.

As this resolution does not require approval by President Biden or even approval by the Senate, it should go into effect shortly.  Will the Senate take up a similar measure?  While it is possible, I think it is less likely due in part to less of an appetite among Senators to wade into the matter.


For additional information:  https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/10/us/politics/house-staff-union.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...