Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Elon Musk has had his fair share of labor and employment law related stories over the years.  And no, we are not talking about this morning’s news that Musk’s bid to buy Twitter is on hold.  With that being said, I did want to note a Musk related development over at Tesla, as it applies to the employment context that is.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


U.S. House Hikes Staffer Pay Effective September 1st

In recent days, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, announced that the minimum pay for Congressional staff will rise to $45,000.00/year starting September 1st.  In recent months, thanks in part to an infamous Instagram account, working conditions at the Capitol for Congressional staff has become a hot button issue that has been simmering.  With that Instagram account reporting on questionable work environments at the Capitol (such as low pay, long hours, and verbally abusive employers, among other issues), there has been increased attention on the matter.  Will this pay hike quell concerns about working conditions for Congressional staff?  Perhaps.  But the question remains, what about the other issues that have come to light following the Instagram account?


With Roe v. Wade On Shaky Ground, Tesla Inserts Itself in the Conversation

For those that might have been living under a rock the past week or two, a draft opinion leaked from the U.S. Supreme Court in a pending case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.  Based upon the leaked draft opinion, the Supreme Court appears to be on the cusp of overturning Roe v. Wade.  While I caution readers that a draft opinion does not represent an actual opinion (as things can still change before the actual opinion is actually released) and there are other blogs which are more suitable for addressing the potential ramifications of Dobbs, I want to highlight a recent development from Tesla on the matter.  As reported by the AP, Tesla is offering to cover the travel costs for any employee that seeks to have an abortion.  This has led to some politicians seeking to cut government funding or business ties with companies that offer this option to its employees.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more