Skip to main content

Labor Department Releases Proposal on Independent Contractor v Employee Classification


Last Tuesday, the Labor Department released its proposal on how workers should be classified in regard to being independent contractors or employees.

The proposal, which marks a stark contract from prior proposals from the Labor Department during President Donald Trump’s term, would dramatically shift things as currently set.  Under the proposal, a multi factor “economic realities” test would be utilized to determine whether a worker was an independent contractor or employee.  This new test, which would examine the totality of the circumstances, would involve equal consideration of a wide range of factors including investment by the worker and the employer, the degree of permanence of the working relationship, the extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business, the degree of skill and initiate exhibited by the worker, the worker’s degree of control over their work, and the “opportunity for profit or loss” based on personal investment or initiative.  Notably, the proposal would allow for additional factors to be considered beyond these six if they indicate the worker may be in business for themselves.

(President Trump’s Labor Department had identified five factors to consider when examining whether a worker was an independent contractor or employee but emphasized two in particular:  1) A worker’s degree of control over their work and 2) “opportunity for profit or loss” based on personal investment or initiative as the two paramount factors to consider.)

Following the release of this proposal, employers such as Uber & Lyft criticized the new standard and argued it would lead to a rash of litigation and an overwhelming rise in labor cost to cover the workers being reclassified as employees rather than independent contractors.

Currently, the general public has time to comment on this proposal before it is amended or adopted.  If I were a betting man, I would expect this proposal to take effect as is (or with minimal changes.)


For a copy of the Labor Department’s proposed rule:  https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-21454.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies i...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more