Skip to main content

Breaking: Rail Union Rejects Tentative Agreement; Strike Looms


Earlier this afternoon, the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division (“BMWED”) announced that 56% of its workers had rejected a temporary agreement recently brokered by the Biden Administration.

What does this mean?  Let’s first take a step back.  In recent weeks, the Biden Administration sat major freight rail operators and unions down to hash out an agreement over a new labor contract.  While a tentative agreement was reached, there was hesitation over whether all parties (namely the workers) would validate and approve the deal.  Workers had long grumbled that they experienced poor working conditions and inadequate pay.  From their viewpoint, the tentative agreement did not allay those concerns.

Lo and behold, this afternoon’s news confirms as much.  With 56% of BMWED workers voting against the agreement, it appears any “victory lap” by the Biden Administration over a deal being reached is short lived.  At this point, there is a growing belief that a strike among rail workers will take place in the coming weeks, threatening to bring the economy to a screeching halt heading into the Christmas season.

I will note, that just because the tentative agreement has been struck down, that does not necessarily mean a strike will happen.  As suggested, while a strike appears imminent, and organized labor is certainly saber rattling, I expect all parties will come back to the bargaining table and restart negotiations in the coming weeks.  The Biden Administration is certainly likely to play a key role again as it seeks to right a shaky economy and seek a win headed into the midterms.

Buckle up thought, the next few weeks should prove to be rather bumpy.


For additional information:  https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/rail-union-rejects-labor-deal-brokered-biden-administration-whats-next-rcna51543

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...