Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Here we are, a week into the new year and there are a few updates/developments on some labor & employment law topics that dominated the news during 2020.  I call attention to these updates in particular, given that these are ongoing topics that I expect we will hear more about as 2022 unfolds.  Of course in the coming weeks we will give a nod to the two cases that were heard by the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this morning.  However, for the time being, we will focus this post on a few other topics.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Let us call this a bit of breaking news as earlier this morning, Citigroup announced that by January 31st, it will terminate all unvaccinated workers.  While the company had previously indicated it would require the coronavirus vaccine as a condition of employment, it was a bit unclear as to what the company would ultimately do with those workers that did not get the vaccine.  According to Citigroup, because of its role as a government contractor, it decided to follow the edict previously set out by President Joe Biden that the employees of any federal contractor must get the coronavirus vaccine.  For those Citigroup workers that have not yet gotten the vaccine (which is apparently about 10% of Citigroup’s workforce), time is running out before the pink slip is handed out…  



Sebastian Herrera over at The Wall Street Journal wrote an article in which he noted that as a result of the high employee turnover at Amazon, it muddies the waters as union organizers and the company try and prepare for a second election at the Bessemer, Alabama warehouse.  As the article notes, an estimated 1,000 employees at the Bessemer location left their employment between the time when the first election occurred and when it ended (approximately a two month timeframe.)  Given the warehouse employs about 6,000 workers (with only about half voting in the first election), this has made it difficult for both the union organizers and the company to plan (and predict) the outcome of the second election that has been ordered to take place this year.  As with many developing stories headed into 2022, this is one to keep an eye on.



Marty Walsh, the Labor Secretary, recently did an interview with The Washington Post in which he touched on several key happenings in the employment law sector since he became the Labor Secretary nearly a year ago.  I will refer readers to the text of the interview itself.  While there is nothing “earth shattering” in terms of news or comments from Secretary Walsh, it is worth a quick read for anyone looking for some insight into how the Labor Secretary (and the President Joe Biden Administration) view the past year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...