Skip to main content

Unionization Efforts at Starbucks Continues to Spread


As the saying goes, once the ball gets rolling downhill, it can be hard to stop.  I would say that is one way to look at how the successful unionization efforts at two Buffalo area Starbucks has led to a growing number of workers at other Starbucks locations around the country taking steps to unionize as well.

Of course readers are likely aware of a few Boston area Starbucks locations taking steps to unionize, an election currently underway at a Mesa, Arizona location, as well as unionization efforts underway in Chicago, Cleveland, Seattle, Tallahassee, and Santa Cruz, among other locations.  In fact, recently, a union election was approved at three additional New York locations with ballots set to be mailed to eligible workers on January 31st.

Readers might be saying, ok…so what?  For starters, if readers will recall, the successful unionization efforts at the two Buffalo area Starbucks was the first successful unionization of any company owned location.  While the unionization vote at a third Buffalo location was unsuccessful, the two victories were used to show that unionization was possible.  That led to other workers around the country attempting to unionize as well.  While we await the results in Mesa and New York, I think it is certainly likely, if not probable, that we will start to see more and more unionizations at Starbucks locations this year.  It would not surprise me if these unionization efforts are used by organized labor and/or the President Joe Biden Administration in an effort to show that there is a (growing) demand for labor unions after decades of steady decline.  Stay tuned.



For additional information on the recently approved election at the New York locations:  https://time.com/6139514/starbucks-staff-union-vote-ny/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more