Skip to main content

Starbucks Attempts to Halt Union Election in Mesa, Arizona


Earlier this week, Starbucks filed an appeal with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) and requested that the union election currently underway in Mesa, Arizona be halted while the company seeks to have union elections occur regionally rather than with each individual store.

Readers will recall that the first successful unionization of a company owned location was met with surprise by some earlier this year.  Those two successful elections resulted in two Buffalo area Starbucks locations overturning the apple cart and successfully unionizing.   That has led to other Starbucks workers around the country making moves to unionize as a result.

However, these union elections are only occurring because of a prior ruling that allowed individual union elections at each Starbucks locations, rather than having regional elections which would likely dilute the vote and make unionization less likely.  Nevertheless, these individual elections have commenced with a Mesa, Arizona location currently doing a mail in election as we speak.

In the appeal filed by Starbucks earlier this week, the company has urged the Mesa vote be halted while the NLRB considers whether or not to allow these individual elections to continue or instead only allow for a regional vote.  At this time, the NLRB has not issued any ruling nor have they halted the vote in Mesa.  With ballots due back in the Mesa election next week, the clock is ticking in regard to what (if anything) the NLRB will do here.  If I had to guess, I would suspect these individual elections will be allowed to continue.  Stay tuned.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

Happening Tomorrow: Connecticut’s Minimum Wage Increases

For those employers and employees alike in Connecticut, mark your calendars as tomorrow, the minimum wage rate increases in the state from $13/hour to $14/hour. This wage hike comes after Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont had signed Public Act 19-4 into law in 2019 which progressively raised the state’s hourly minimum wage rate every year for five years.  In fact, next year, the hourly wage rate will top out at $15/hour.  Beginning in January of 2024, the hourly wage rate will be indexed to the employment cost index. For additional information:   https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2022/06-2022/Governor-Lamont-Reminds-Residents-That-Minimum-Wage-Is-Scheduled-To-Increase-on-Friday

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa