Skip to main content

Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Rulings in Vaccine Mandate Cases


That did not take long, did it?  Only a few short days after the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on two coronavirus vaccine mandate cases, we have the Court’s rulings.

Let us start first with the case that dealt with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) requirement that employers with 100 or more employees would be required to have their employees either get the coronavirus vaccine or submit to weekly testing.  For those employees that were not vaccinated, they were required to wear masks while in the workplace.  In a 6 - 3 ruling, the Supreme Court held that while Congress had given OSHA to regulate dangers in the workplace, OSHA did not have Congressional authority to regulate public health measures more broadly.  Consequently, a majority of the Court struck down this mandate.

However, one thing to keep in mind is that an employer, on their own volition, can still require their employees get the vaccine (unless there is a contract or collective bargaining agreement that would require a bargaining process before such a policy was created.)  What today’s ruling from the Court does is say that the federal government cannot mandate this, at least in this instance based upon how OSHA tried to write and enact this particular mandate…despite the fact that employers could still do so at their own will.

The second case centered on a requirement that healthcare workers at facilities that receive Medicare or Medicaid get the coronavirus vaccine as a condition of employment, unless there was a medical or religious exemption.  In a narrow 5 - 4 ruling, the Court upheld this requirement on the grounds that the requirement, issued by the Health & Human Services, was within the scope of authority provided by Congress.

For those for or against coronavirus vaccine mandates, today’s rulings are both a win and a loss.  With that being said, the vaccine mandate for large employers getting struck down is likely to impact more workers across the country.  The question now to consider is whether Congress will attempt to confer additional authority to OSHA in an effort to circumvent today’s ruling and ultimately implement a vaccine mandate for large scale employers?  Something tells me that even with Democrats having majority control of Congress, that would be no easy task and therefore unlikely.


For additional information:   https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/13/supreme-court-ruling-biden-covid-vaccine-mandates.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...