Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Workplace safety has been a somewhat common topic over the past year, due in no small part to concerns over workplace safety in light of the coronavirus pandemic.  While there are several articles I want to highlight for readers this week, I call particular attention to the first article in regard to an employee that was allegedly fired after raising concerns about workplace safety in regard to possible transmission of the coronavirus at work.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Earlier this month, the Labor Department announced it had filed suit against PACCAR, Inc. d/b/a Peterbilt Motor Co. after the company allegedly terminated an employee who voiced concerns about being exposed to coronavirus in the workplace.  According to the lawsuit, the employee had expressed concerns about contracting the coronavirus in the workplace last year, despite the company saying they would clean the workplace to prevent transmission.  After the employee voiced his doubts about the steps being taken to prevent transmission in the workplace, the employee was terminated.  Prior to filing suit, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration found that the employee was engaged in protected activity by voicing workplace safety concerns.  This lawsuit seeks to have the employee reinstated, paid his back wages, along with interest and compensatory damages.  This is an interesting cases for readers to watch progress through the legal system.



As readers might recall, unionization efforts are underway at several Buffalo area Starbucks.  While it is not yet clear the outcome of the elections (as votes are still being cast), Workers United (the union that is attempting to unionize a few of the Buffalo area Starbucks locations) is seeking to have the National Labor Relations Board approve an election at a Mesa, Arizona location.  I had previously noted that the attempted unionization of a few of the Buffalo area Starbucks might lead to unionization efforts elsewhere.  It looks like this might be the tip of the iceberg.



A few weeks ago, I had made note of the Great Resignation, a name given to the recent onslaught of workers that have abruptly quit their jobs in seemingly large numbers.  However, Jeff Cox at CNBC suggests that perhaps the Great Resignation has been overblown.  His reasoning?  Many experts claim the large number of resignations is not due to employees being overworked but rather hesitant to work in their given filed during the coronavirus pandemic.  As well, Cox notes that while more than 4.4 million workers left their jobs back in September, nearly 6.5 million workers were actually hired that same month.  Is there a clear answer as to whether the Great Resignation is all it has been cracked up to be?  Maybe, maybe not.  Regardless, this article is worth a read to get a different perspective on the matter.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more