Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Coronavirus testing, minimum wage hikes, and union elections…talk about quite the range of topics this week.  I encourage readers to take a look at all three topics but will call attention to the Zoom discussion happening in a few hours in regard to coronavirus testing for large scale employers.  That one is well worth joining if you have some spare time today.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Today at noon EST, there is a Zoom discussion being held buy several employment law attorneys in which they are talking about the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (“OSHA”) and their recent requirement that large scale employers either require their employees be vaccinated or tested weekly.  Readers will recall that this has been an evolving story but I encourage those looking for more information on the matter to join the Zoom discussion in a few hours.



As we are about a year out from next November’s election, minimum wage advocates in Nebraska have started a petition to try and get a minimum wage measure on the ballot in 2022.  Nebraska’s current hourly minimum wage rate is $9/hour.  This proposed minimum wage hike that could be in front of voters next year would raise the hourly minimum wage rate by $1.50 every year and eventually top out at $15/hour in 2026.  Whether this petition (and possible approval by voters) is not assured, a prior petition and vote in 2017 was successful.  Keep an eye on this one.



Readers might recall that unionization efforts are underway at several Buffalo area Starbucks.  This is somewhat of an unprecedented move as Starbucks has been relatively successful preventing unionization at its stores.  However, this week, votes have begun to be mailed to eligible employees to vote with an expectation that votes will be counted on December 8th.  It should come as no surprise that Starbucks is intent to beat back this unionization effort.  Whether they will again be successful remains to be seen.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more