Skip to main content

Updated: Biden Administration Amends Compliance Date For Workplace Vaccine Mandate


Readers will likely recall that in recent months, the President Biden administration issued an executive order requiring all federal contractors to be vaccinated as well as instructing the Labor Department to work with the Occupation Safety and Health Administration on a requirement that employers with 100 or more employees require vaccinations.

Let us take this in two parts, starting first with an amendment to the federal contractor vaccination requirement.  Previously, the executive order required all federal contractors be vaccinated by December 8th.  However, there have been a growing number of grips and complaints about this deadline as many critics said it would further exacerbate supply chain issues heading into the holiday season.  However, earlier today, that vaccination deadline for federal contractors was moved to January 4th.

In regard to the vaccination requirement for employers with 100 or more employees, that requirement is now set to go into effect on January 4th as well (with an option for employees to skip vaccinations and instead submit to weekly testing.)  Notably, workers must have received either their second shot of Pfizer of Moderna or their single shot of Johnson & Johnson by that January 4th date.  However, the Biden administration today announced that starting December 5th, all unvaccinated workers will be required to start wearing masks in the workplace and provide a negative coronavirus test after the January 4th deadline.  I do want to point out one particularly troublesome development for employees though:  Companies will not be required to pay for testing unless otherwise required by state or federal law or if it is in a collective bargaining agreement.  This could turn into a rather expensive, ongoing cost for unvaccinated workers at large scale employers.

I do want to note, however, that these vaccine mandates do not apply to workplaces in which others are not present, for employees that work remotely, or employees that perform their work exclusively outside.

The fines that can be levied against large scale employers for non compliance are somewhat sizable:  $13,653.00 for each “serious” violation all the way up to $136,532.00 if an employer willfully violates this mandate.

While this workplace vaccine mandate compliance date could yet again be moved or held up in the court system, I think it will go into effect sooner rather than later.  Federal contractors and large scale employers would be wise to start planning accordingly.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more