Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: Update Edition


Recently, there have been several developments on some topics I have written about that I wanted to bring to the attention of readers.  As with many topics I write about, situations change and are constantly evolving.  As we head into the homestretch of 2021, I wanted to highlight a few recent developments that readers might find worth a read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Coronavirus Testing, Vaccinations, & Paid Leave

Yesterday, it was announced that there is a new deadline for large employer to comply with the coronavirus vaccine requirements as directed by the Biden administration.  Following the Occupational Safety and Health Administration issuing its Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”) on the matter, questions have started to arise over what, if any, paid leave employers will be required to provide to employees to get tested and/or get a coronavirus vaccine.  Earlier this morning, Jeff Nowak over at FMLA Insights posted a good overview on the matter that I would suggest readers take a look at to get a better handle on the topic.


As Unionization Effort Gets Second Bite At the Apple, Amazon Remains On Offense

Earlier this year, Amazon successfully beat back a unionization effort at one of its warehouses in Alabama.  In fact, the defeat was somewhat resounding, given how many people surmised it might be close and perhaps the first unionization at an Amazon workplace.  Nevertheless, a challenge was subsequently asserted to the election results on the grounds that a ballot receptacle on the workplace premises tainted the final outcome.  In doing so, there have been rumblings that a second election might be on the horizon.  As a result, as this article from Reuters notes, Amazon has been staying on offense in recent weeks by requiring workers to attend meetings and posting signage critical of labor unions, among other measures.  While a second vote is not assured, Amazon appears to be taking it as a serious possibility and doing what it can to get ahead of the matter before/if a second election gets set.


Union Rejects John Deere’s “Last, Best, & Final” Offer

On Wednesday, the United Auto Workers (which represents over 10,000 unionized John Deere workers currently on strike) rejected the most recent collective bargaining proposal from John Deere.  While the decision to reject the proposal was somewhat close (55% - 45%), the union indicated the proposed six year agreement which included annual raises was not sufficient.  In doing so, the strike will extend into yet another week as both sides appear to be digging in their heels.  One thing to note, however, is this vote to reject the most recent proposal from John Deere was much narrower than the previous 90% vote in favor of going on strike.  Stay tuned.


House Democrats Plan to Include 4 Weeks of Paid Leave in Their Domestic Policy Legislation

Remember last week when a proposed 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave was jettisoned from the proposed legislation Democrats in Congress were working on and many thought paid leave was D.O.A.?  In the words of Lee Corso…not so fast, my friend.  Yesterday, House Democrats indicated they would seek to include 4 weeks of paid leave in the legislation currently working its way through Congress.  Now as anyone that follows Congress will tell you, both the House and Senate have to vote on and approve the same legislation.  That presents a problem when there does not appear to be enough support in the Senate for paid leave in this legislation…given that there are already gripes about what the legislation will cost and paid leave being one of the things that went to the chopping block to winnow down costs.  For those hoping to see paid leave in the final version of this legislation when/if it hits President Joe Biden’s desk…I would not necessarily hold your breath.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...