Skip to main content

EEOC Roundup: November Edition


As always, there are some EEOC cases that jump out at me when I review developments on that front.  In fact, by my count, it has been about a year since I last highlighted some recent EEOC cases.  I suppose twelve months later is as good of a time as any to do another EEOC Roundup.  Below are a couple EEOC cases and settlements that caught my eye this week. 


Former Owner of VHS West Suburban Medical Center Agrees to Settle Disability Discrimination Suit

The former owner of VHS West Suburban Medical Center has agreed to settle a disability discrimination suit for $150,000 following a recent lawsuit that was filed following claims of a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).  The lawsuit claimed that a worker requested a reasonable accommodation of a temporary, part time schedule in January 2016.  Her employer instead put her on unpaid leave.  Even after notifying her employer that the reasonable accommodation was no longer needed, she was not allowed to return to work and was subsequently terminated in July 2016.  This alleged conduct is in violation of the ADA which prohibits employers from discriminating against an employee/applicant on the basis of a disability as well as failing to provide a reasonable accommodation. 


Greyhound to Pay $45,000 to Settle Religious Discrimination Suit

Last week, it was announced that Greyhound would pay $45,000 to settle a religious discrimination suit after it allegedly discriminated against a worker that requested to wear an abaya (a loose fitting ankle length outfit that covers the wearer’s body with the intent to protect the wearer’s modesty.)  According to the lawsuit, when interviewing for a position with Greyhound, the worker requested to wear the abaya if hired.  She was apparently told that was fine.  However, after starting training, she was told she could not wear it, despite the requested accommodation.  Greyhound stipulated that while a few revisions could be made to the required workplace outfit, the abaya could not be worn as another Muslim worker accepted Greyhound’s minor revisions (sans abaya) to the workplace outfit.  The worker subsequently withdrew from the training program and filed suit against Greyhound on the grounds that she was unlawfully discriminated against on the basis of her religion.  These alleged actions by Greyhound are in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which requires employers to accommodate an employee/applicant’s sincerely held religious beliefs so long as it would not pose an undue hardship on the employer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations