Skip to main content

Third Time Is the Charm? John Deere Strike *Might* Finally Be Over, Pending a Ratification Vote From Local Unions


The ongoing John Deere strike has been notable in two regards:  1) over 10,000 unionized workers have been on strike for what it going on over a month; and 2) despite repeated failures to secure a new agreement between the company and its workers, a third attempt at reaching an agreement might finally end the strike.

The size and scale of the strike has been notable in so much that it has slowed production at the company and forced John Deere to bring in non unionized workers in an effort to bridge the gap.  While prior attempts had been made to reach a resolution on a new agreement, the local unions have failed to ratify the prior tentative agreements.  (The ratification of a new agreement is required by the local unions rather than just by the United Auto Workers, which is negotiating with the company.)  Despite coming close on the most recent ratification vote (55% against, 45% for ratification), there is hope that this third tentative agreement will finally put an end to the strike.

As of this writing, details of what is/is not in the third tentative are not clear.  However, it is possible that the third tentative agreement could be ratified as soon as tomorrow.  Keep an eye on this one...we might be closing in on the finish line.


For additional information:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Business/john-deere-reaches-3rd-tentative-deal-workers-strike/story%3fid=81177902

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...