Skip to main content

Breaking: Sixth Circuit to Hear Employer Vaccine Mandate Cases


Earlier today, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals was selected as the Circuit that will hear the challenges to the Biden Administration’s large scale employer vaccine mandate.

As previously noted, there have been a host of lawsuits filed in various parts of the country in an effort to stop the implementation of the large scale employer vaccine mandate that was set to go into effect on January 4th.  Late last week, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a permanent stay on the vaccine mandate.  However, the Court wrote that it could be lifted by another Circuit.

That brings us to today’s development.  As there are several cases pending around the country dealing with this vaccine mandate, the Justice Department was charged with conducting a random section of one Circuit in which the cases would be consolidated and heard.  That random selection was done as any “gambler” might like...via a lotto ball drawing.  Note, this is not abnormal.  This is the way it is decided which Circuit will hear a group of consolidated cases.

While opponents of the mandate were hoping a conservative Circuit, such as the Fifth Circuit, would hear the matter and proponents of the mandate were holding out hope that a liberal Circuit like the Ninth Circuit would get it, the Sixth Circuit turned out to be the winner today.

Of course, there are no guarantees how things will play out in the Sixth Circuit but the Sixth Circuit tends to have a more conservative skew.  If I were a betting man, I would expect the Fifth Circuit’s stay will remain in place and an eventual ruling by the Sixth Circuit striking down the mandate will eventually be issued.  With that being said, the U.S. Supreme Court will likely weigh in on the matter once the Sixth Circuit acts.  Hold on tight, things are just getting started.


For additional information:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/11/16/politics/vaccine-mandate-osha-lottery/index.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more