Skip to main content

Breaking: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Stay On Employer Vaccine Mandate


Let us call this a hot of the presses breaking news matter for a late Friday evening.  A few hours ago, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a stay it previously issued that will prevent the Biden Administration’s vaccine mandate for employers with 100 or more employees from taking effect.

Readers might recall that a stay was recently issued by the Fifth Circuit with time allowed for the Biden Administration to file a response.  The Biden Administration did just that and framed the vaccine mandate as a life or death matter that was needed to prevent widespread infections and deaths.

In the opinion issued this evening by the Fifth Circuit, the Court rejected the arguments made by the Biden Administration, pointing out that the vaccine mandate did not account for differences in workplaces (where some workers might be working side by side while others might work solo).  The Court went on to question the Biden Administration’s life or death argument since the vaccine mandate did not apply to employers with 99 or fewer employees.

For those hoping that the Fifth Circuit would undo its prior stay of the vaccine mandate...this is a swift blow to those hopes.  With that being said, there are other cases pending in different circuits so this is certainly not the last we have heard on the matter.  In fact, in the opinion issued this evening, the Court noted the stay could be lifted if another court issued a ruling overturning the stay.  At some point, perhaps sooner rather than later, this matter is likely to end up before the Supreme Court.


For a copy of the Fifth Circuit’s opinion:  https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-60845-CV0.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more