Skip to main content

Breaking: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Upholds Stay On Employer Vaccine Mandate


Let us call this a hot of the presses breaking news matter for a late Friday evening.  A few hours ago, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a stay it previously issued that will prevent the Biden Administration’s vaccine mandate for employers with 100 or more employees from taking effect.

Readers might recall that a stay was recently issued by the Fifth Circuit with time allowed for the Biden Administration to file a response.  The Biden Administration did just that and framed the vaccine mandate as a life or death matter that was needed to prevent widespread infections and deaths.

In the opinion issued this evening by the Fifth Circuit, the Court rejected the arguments made by the Biden Administration, pointing out that the vaccine mandate did not account for differences in workplaces (where some workers might be working side by side while others might work solo).  The Court went on to question the Biden Administration’s life or death argument since the vaccine mandate did not apply to employers with 99 or fewer employees.

For those hoping that the Fifth Circuit would undo its prior stay of the vaccine mandate...this is a swift blow to those hopes.  With that being said, there are other cases pending in different circuits so this is certainly not the last we have heard on the matter.  In fact, in the opinion issued this evening, the Court noted the stay could be lifted if another court issued a ruling overturning the stay.  At some point, perhaps sooner rather than later, this matter is likely to end up before the Supreme Court.


For a copy of the Fifth Circuit’s opinion:  https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-60845-CV0.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more