Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


For those that may have heard, late last week there was a ruling in the U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation.  That case, set for trial shortly, took a major turn for the worse (for some, that is) as the Judge granted summary judgment against the U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team on a majority of their claims.  I will not spoil things further, but the below article is worth a read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Congress Considering Providing Liability Protections For Employers As Workers Return To Workplaces

The Washington Post has an article which notes a brewing fight in Congress over whether to provide liability protections for employers should their workers contract coronavirus when they return to work.  This issue appears to be a party line fight with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Republicans favoring providing these protections to employers while Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Democrats are lining up against it.


U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team’s Equal Pay & Gender Discrimination Claims Falter

Last year, the U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team filed suit against the U.S. Soccer Federation on a host of claims, including an equal pay claim, allegations of gender discrimination, as well as being subjected to discriminatory working conditions in relation to travel.  There had been much back and forth between the parties with a motion for summary judgment under advisement with the Court.  In a ruling that caught many by surprise, last Friday, the Judge granted summary judgment in favor of the U.S. Soccer Federation as to the equal pay and gender discrimination claims.  The ruling tried in part upon a finding that the U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team has collectively bargained for their pay structure (which included guaranteed salaries and a minimum number of players that were to be paid.)  Had there not been a collective bargaining agreement in place, I could see this request for summary judgment having been denied.  However, as many have pointed out, it is difficult to cry foul over a pay rate when you yourself bargained over those terms.  While the claim of being subjected to discriminatory working conditions lives on, I would expect to see an appeal of this summary judgment ruling.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more