Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: Labor Law Edition


For those keeping tabs at home, you might have noticed the abundance of labor law related posts the past four days.  Today marks the fifth and final day of the defacto labor law week.  Rounding out the week, we have a few articles which touch on some relevant labor law related updates. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


NLRB Issues Election Protection Rule, Changing 3 Aspects of Representation Election Process & Procedures

The National Law Review has a concise summary of three changes the NLRB has made to its representation election process and procedures, set to take effect June 1st.  The three changes include a change to the process in which a union can prevent employees from voting whether they want to have new union representation (representation election) or if they instead want to be represented by the incumbent union (decertification election); a change to how employers can voluntarily recognize a union rather than having employees vote to have a union represent them; and a change Section 9(a) recognition in the construction industry.  A review of this article is well worth the time to get caught up on these changes set to take effect in a month’s time.


Petitions For Representation Elections Were Up This Year...& Then the Coronavirus Came Along

Robert Combs at Bloomberg Law wrote an article recently in which he noted that up until mid March, the number of petitions for representative elections filed with the NLRB were up.  Way up, actually, to the tune of nearly 80 more petitions filed in 2020 then during the same timeframe last year.  (Up until mid March there were 411 petitions filed compared to 324 during the same timeframe in 2019.)  As well, the NLRB reported that it had only received 54 decertification petitions from January 1st through March 14th, marking the lowest number received in nearly 5 years.  Although there has still been a year over year trend of decertification petitions, before the coronavirus situation threw things into flux, more certification petitions than decertification petitions had been received.  How will things shake out now that elections are able to be held again?  That remains to be seen.


Amazon Reportedly Using “Heat Maps” to Track Potential Unionization at Whole Foods Stores

This is an interesting story.  Apparently Amazon (who owns Whole Foods) has implements “heat maps” to track which of its Whole Foods stores are at risk of unionization.  The “heat maps” are said to rate each of the 510 Whole Foods stores based on the likelihood that its employees might form or join a union.  The scores for each store are based upon a variety of factors including the “loyalty” of employees, turnover rates, racial diversity, proximity to a union office, and violations as recorded by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.  The scores are then apparently fed onto a heat map with red spots indicating a store that is at “risk”.  Interesting, to say the least.


NLRB Charge Against Fuyao Glass America Dismissed

Readers might have seen the documentary on Netflix entitled American Factory, which chronicles a Chinese company, Fuyao, opening up a glass manufacturing plant in Ohio.  The documentary follows Fuyao Glass America, the American arm of Fuyao, and some of the struggles the company had with its workforce.  In one scene in particular, the documentary film crew filmed the current chief executive of Fuyao Glass America talking with Fuyao’s founder in 2016 or 2017 about a possible unionization at the plant.  The translation (from Mandarin) appeared to show the founder being told that a few employees at the plant were terminated in order to stamp out their unionization efforts.  (It is worth noting that there is some dispute over the translation and what was/was not said.)  As Thomas Gnau at The Dayton Daily News writes, the NLRB dismissed a charge that had been filed in August of 2019 which accused the company of an unfair labor practice.  Patricia Naschand, NLRB Ohio Acting Regional Director, dismissed the charge on the grounds that it was untimely.  (The charge was filed more than 2 years after the alleged statement occurred and more than 6 months after employees were put on notice of the statements, after the documentary aired at a festival.)


CORT Furniture Rental Employees Allege Terminations Were Effort to Stamp Out Unionization

On the topic of companies allegedly terminating employees to stop efforts to unionize, The New York Daily News has an article on allegations swirling around a CORT Furniture Rental Location in New Jersey.  According to some employees, the company terminated them (approximately 10 - 15 positions) at the end of March not because of the coronavirus (as the company said that led to a slowdown in business which necessitated the need to let some employees go) but rather because the company was trying to prevent employees from unionizing.  Leading up to the terminations, some warehouse workers were organizing with Teamsters Local 814.  With similar allegations popping up around the country at a host of different businesses, I suspect these stories will be the norm for a while.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per