Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Assembly Bill 2355 (California)


As with many employment and labor as related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Under California law as currently written, employers in the state have no duty to accommodate the medical use of marijuana at work, even if the marijuana is legally prescribed for a disability.  Employers in the state may also lawfully choose to not hire an applicant that tests positive for marijuana.  That could soon change.

Earlier this year, Assembly Bill 2355 (“AB 2355”) was introduced in the California Legislature, which seeks to prevent employers in the state from refusing to hire or employ any person (or discriminate against a person) because that person is a medical marijuana user.  As well, employees that use medical marijuana while employed would have the same rights to reasonable accommodations and the associated interactive process as those employees that are prescribed other legal drugs.

The legislation does have a few carveouts as employer’s would be exempt from AB 2355 if:  The employer requires its employees or applicants to be drug and alcohol for legitimate safety reasons as mandated by state or federal law; retaining the employee would reasonably cause the employer to lose a monetary or licensing related benefit or incur damages under a federal law or regulation; the employer determined the employee was using or was impaired by the use of the medical marijuana at work or during work hours.

Currently, AB 2355 is in committee, with no relevant movement since mid March.  It would not surprise me if AB 2355 faltered this legislative session but was given another look sometime down the road.


For additional information:  https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB2355

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more